API Flow

🔧 Your Use Case

You are building a multi-organization geospatial API. Each organization has:

Its own PostgreSQL/PostGIS database
A REST API to manage login and serve GeoJSON
Now you want to introduce GeoServer to serve the data via WFS/WMS
You want to store, serve, and view layer metadata properly, possibly in JSON

✅ API Flow (Existing)

You described your API structure like this:

API Endpoints:

POST /login
→ Takes { user, pw } → returns Bearer token
GET /
→ Lists organization names (databases)
GET /:orgName
→ Lists all layers for that organization
GET /:orgName/:layerName
→ Returns raw GeoJSON for that layer

You now want to connect this structure to GeoServer and serve layers as WFS with rich metadata.

⚙️ Integrating with GeoServer

1. Connect your PostgreSQL databases to GeoServer

Use the GeoServer UI or REST API to create datastores for each organization's database
Each layer (table/view) is a FeatureType
Organize layers into Workspaces (e.g., org1_ws, org2_ws)

2. Expose Layers via WFS

Example WFS URL:

bash
http://localhost:8080/geoserver/ows?service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=GetFeature&typeName=org1_ws:buildings&outputFormat=application/json

Use this in your frontend or serve via your API as a proxy if needed.

📝 Adding Metadata to GeoServer Layers

You wanted to add rich metadata inside GeoServer, not in the request URLs.

✅ Manual Method (GeoServer UI):

Go to:

Layers → [Layer Name] → Data tab / Publishing tab

Fill in:

Title – Human-readable name
Abstract – Short description
Keywords – Tags for search
Metadata Links – Optional (link to JSON/XML metadata file)
Attribution – Author, source, license

✅ REST API Method:

http
PUT http://localhost:8080/geoserver/rest/workspaces/org1_ws/datastores/org1_store/featuretypes/buildings
Content-Type: application/json
Authorization: Basic (admin:geoserver)

{
  "featureType": {
    "title": "City Buildings",
    "abstract": "Detailed building polygons with attributes...",
    "keywords": {
      "string": ["buildings", "city", "org1"]
    },
    "metadataLinks": {
      "metadataLink": [{
        "type": "ISO19115:2003",
        "metadataType": "text/html",
        "content": "https://example.com/metadata/buildings.html"
      }]
    }
  }
}

❓ Your Metadata Formatting Issue

You tried putting rich metadata in abstract like this:

json
"abstract": "File Name: land_use_zones.shp\r\nFile Type: ESRI Shapefile\r\nGeometry Type: Polygon..."

But it looked messy because:

GeoServer stores abstract as plain text
No support for \n, \r\n, or markdown/HTML

✅ Solutions to Display Metadata Better (Without External Links)

✔️ 1. Clean Plain-Text Formatting (Recommended)

Use bullet-style formatting:

plaintext
Land Use Zones:

- File: land_use_zones.shp
- Type: ESRI Shapefile
- Geometry: Polygon
- CRS: EPSG:4326

Attributes:
* ZONE_ID: Integer
* ZONE_TYPE: String
...

This appears clearly in GeoServer UI and GetCapabilities.

✔️ 2. Keep `abstract` short + use `metadataLinks` for full details

json
"abstract": "Zoning layer. See full metadata linked below.",
"metadataLinks": [{
  "type": "application/json",
  "metadataType": "application/json",
  "content": "https://yourdomain.com/metadata/zoning_layer.json"
}]

✔️ 3. If You Control the Client

Fetch metadata from your DB or JSON files
Display it in a nicely formatted UI panel
Combine GeoServer WFS data + your metadata API

❌ Limitations: Why You Can't Use JSON in `abstract`

Option	Supports JSON?	Looks Good?	Use Case
`abstract`	✅ (as plain string)	❌ (ugly formatting)	Avoid
`metadataLinks`	✅ (link to JSON)	✅ (if client parses it)	✔ Recommended
External App	✅	✅	✔ Best for full control

✅ Ways to Get Metadata from GeoServer

Method	URL Example	Includes	Requires Admin
`GetCapabilities` (WFS/WMS)	`/geoserver/ows?...`	Public metadata	❌
REST API	`/geoserver/rest/workspaces/ws/datastores/store/featuretypes/layer.json`	Full config	✅
`DescribeFeatureType`	`/geoserver/wfs?request=DescribeFeatureType...`	Schema only	❌

✅ Final Tips

Use abstract for a short, readable summary
Use metadataLinks for full metadata (JSON/XML/HTML)
Consider building your own metadata microservice or DB if you need more control

Would you like me to:

Generate a clean abstract example for a specific layer?
Help create a JSON metadata structure you can serve?
Help you script REST updates to GeoServer for all your orgs?

Let me know!

one thing want to ask if i ve 50 organizations then should i create 50 db to store their files

Excellent question — and an important architectural decision.

Short answer:

⚠️ No, you probably should not create 50 separate databases unless there's a very strong reason (like legal data separation or multi-tenant isolation requirements).

✅ Recommended: Use 1 database with multi-organization schema

Instead of creating 50 separate PostgreSQL/PostGIS databases, use:

🔸 One database, and either:

✅ Option A: One schema per organization

bash
postgresql://host/dbname
Schemas:
- org1_schema
- org2_schema
- org3_schema
...

Each schema contains its own tables/layers. For example:


org1_schema.schools
org1_schema.roads
org2_schema.schools
org2_schema.roads

GeoServer can easily connect to specific schemas, and you can create 50 datastores (or one dynamic datastore if you're using REST automation).

This balances isolation and manageability.

✅ Option B: One schema, use a `org_id` column in each table

You keep all data in shared tables, and filter it using an organization_id:

sql
Table: public.schools
Columns: id, name, geom, org_id

This is easier to query and manage at scale, but gives less isolation.

Use GeoServer SQL views to filter per org:

sql
SELECT * FROM public.schools WHERE org_id = 'org1'

You can expose these filtered views as separate GeoServer layers.

🛑 When to Use 50 Separate Databases?

Only if you truly need physical isolation, such as:

Each org runs its own GeoServer instance
You’re hosting for clients who require full data isolation
Legal/compliance policies demand strict separation
Different DB versions/extensions per org

Downside:

High operational overhead
Hard to scale
Complex GeoServer datastore management

📊 Comparison

Design	Pros	Cons	Good For
1 DB, 1 schema per org	Isolated, manageable	50 schemas, but still easy	Multi-tenant apps
1 DB, org_id filter	Easiest to scale	Least isolation	Centralized access, APIs
50 DBs	Total isolation	Very hard to manage	Strict compliance hosting

🔁 GeoServer Integration Tips

You can dynamically register datastores via REST API
Use workspace + datastore naming like:
workspace: org1_ws, datastore: org1_store
Use SQL views or filtered layers to serve per-org data cleanly

✅ Recommendation

Use a single PostGIS DB with either multiple schemas (Option A) or shared tables with org_id filters (Option B). This keeps things scalable, fast, and easier to integrate with GeoServer and your API layer.

IT and Web GIS Solutions

Search This Blog

API Flow

🔧 Your Use Case

✅ API Flow (Existing)

API Endpoints:

⚙️ Integrating with GeoServer

1. Connect your PostgreSQL databases to GeoServer

2. Expose Layers via WFS

📝 Adding Metadata to GeoServer Layers

✅ Manual Method (GeoServer UI):

✅ REST API Method:

❓ Your Metadata Formatting Issue

✅ Solutions to Display Metadata Better (Without External Links)

✔️ 1. Clean Plain-Text Formatting (Recommended)

✔️ 2. Keep `abstract` short + use `metadataLinks` for full details

✔️ 3. If You Control the Client

❌ Limitations: Why You Can't Use JSON in `abstract`

✅ Ways to Get Metadata from GeoServer

✅ Final Tips

✅ Recommended: Use 1 database with multi-organization schema

🔸 One database, and either:

✅ Option A: One schema per organization

✅ Option B: One schema, use a `org_id` column in each table

🛑 When to Use 50 Separate Databases?

📊 Comparison

🔁 GeoServer Integration Tips

✅ Recommendation

Comments

Post a Comment

API Flow

🔧 Your Use Case

✅ API Flow (Existing)

API Endpoints:

⚙️ Integrating with GeoServer

1. Connect your PostgreSQL databases to GeoServer

2. Expose Layers via WFS

📝 Adding Metadata to GeoServer Layers

✅ Manual Method (GeoServer UI):

✅ REST API Method:

❓ Your Metadata Formatting Issue

✅ Solutions to Display Metadata Better (Without External Links)

✔️ 1. Clean Plain-Text Formatting (Recommended)

✔️ 2. Keep abstract short + use metadataLinks for full details

✔️ 3. If You Control the Client

❌ Limitations: Why You Can't Use JSON in abstract

✅ Ways to Get Metadata from GeoServer

✅ Final Tips

You said:

ChatGPT said:

✅ Recommended: Use 1 database with multi-organization schema

🔸 One database, and either:

✅ Option A: One schema per organization

✅ Option B: One schema, use a org_id column in each table

🛑 When to Use 50 Separate Databases?

📊 Comparison

🔁 GeoServer Integration Tips

✅ Recommendation

Comments

Post a Comment

✔️ 2. Keep `abstract` short + use `metadataLinks` for full details

❌ Limitations: Why You Can't Use JSON in `abstract`

✅ Option B: One schema, use a `org_id` column in each table